Cunningham v. Wilde

9 N.W. 304, 56 Iowa 369
CourtSupreme Court of Iowa
DecidedJune 15, 1881
StatusPublished
Cited by1 cases

This text of 9 N.W. 304 (Cunningham v. Wilde) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Iowa primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Cunningham v. Wilde, 9 N.W. 304, 56 Iowa 369 (iowa 1881).

Opinion

Day, J.

Appellant’s counsel concede that the case of Lucas v. Sawyer, 17 Iowa, 517, is adverse to the position which they assume, and in an argument exhibiting much research and earnestness, they ask that that decision be re-examined and overruled. Lucas v. Sawyer was decided in [370]*3701864. It is not a hasty or ill-considered decision, but, upon the contrary, the question is elaborately discussed and deliberately determined. The decision announces a rule of property. Eor seventeen years it has passed unchallenged by the legislature, and, so far as we are advised, by the profession. It was followed in Sturdevant v. Norris, 30 Iowa, 65, and, quite recently, in Parker v. Small, 55 Iowa, 732. This seems to be a most fitting occasion for the application of the salutary maxim, stare decisis et non quieta movere. The demurrer, in our opinion, was properly sustained.

Affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Chamberlain v. Anderson
195 Iowa 855 (Supreme Court of Iowa, 1922)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
9 N.W. 304, 56 Iowa 369, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/cunningham-v-wilde-iowa-1881.