Cunningham v. Waterloo Cash Co.
93 S.E. 243, 108 S.C. 27, 1917 S.C. LEXIS 193
Opinion
The opinion of the Court was delivered by
The facts are stated in the decree of his Honor, the Circuit Judge. The sole question is whether the mortgage therein described has been paid. The appellant’s attorneys have failed to satisfy this Court, by the preponderance of evidence, that the findings of fact by the Circuit Court are erroneous.
Affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cunningham v. Waterloo Cash Co., 93 S.E. 243, 108 S.C. 27, 1917 S.C. LEXIS 193 (S.C. 1917).
93 S.E. 243 (Cunningham v. Waterloo Cash Co.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.