Cunningham v. Waterloo Cash Co.
93 S.E. 243, 108 S.C. 27, 1917 S.C. LEXIS 193
This text of 93 S.E. 243 (Cunningham v. Waterloo Cash Co.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of South Carolina primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Bluebook
Cunningham v. Waterloo Cash Co., 93 S.E. 243, 108 S.C. 27, 1917 S.C. LEXIS 193 (S.C. 1917).
Opinion
The opinion of the Court was delivered by
The facts are stated in the decree of his Honor, the Circuit Judge. The sole question is whether the mortgage therein described has been paid. The appellant’s attorneys have failed to satisfy this Court, by the preponderance of evidence, that the findings of fact by the Circuit Court are erroneous.
Affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bluebook (online)
93 S.E. 243, 108 S.C. 27, 1917 S.C. LEXIS 193, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/cunningham-v-waterloo-cash-co-sc-1917.