Cunningham v. Warden of Maryland House of Correction
This text of 213 Md. 642 (Cunningham v. Warden of Maryland House of Correction) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Maryland primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
delivered the opinion of the Court.
This is an application for leave to appeal from a denial of a writ of habeas corpus. Petitioner was sentenced to two years in the Reformatory for Males, after being convicted of receiving stolen goods. He escaped and was sentenced for [643]*643an additional six months. Petitioner complains of the insufficiency of the evidence to convict. It is well settled that the sufficiency of the evidence can be reviewed only on direct appeal, but not on habeas corpus. Walker v. Warden, 210 Md. 654, and cases cited. The petitioner was represented by counsel, and no appeal was taken.
Application denied, with costs.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
213 Md. 642, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/cunningham-v-warden-of-maryland-house-of-correction-md-1957.