Cunningham v. Wallace

62 A. 784, 213 Pa. 199, 1906 Pa. LEXIS 446
CourtSupreme Court of Pennsylvania
DecidedJanuary 2, 1906
DocketAppeal, No. 42
StatusPublished

This text of 62 A. 784 (Cunningham v. Wallace) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Pennsylvania primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Cunningham v. Wallace, 62 A. 784, 213 Pa. 199, 1906 Pa. LEXIS 446 (Pa. 1906).

Opinion

Per Curiam,

The services of the master were familiar to the court below, and he was in better position to judge as to the proper compensation than we can be. We have not been convinced that there was any abuse of his discretion, and the judgment is therefore affirmed on his opinion.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
62 A. 784, 213 Pa. 199, 1906 Pa. LEXIS 446, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/cunningham-v-wallace-pa-1906.