Cunningham v. Thompson

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Cunningham v. Thompson

958 So. 2d 562, 2007 Fla. App. LEXIS 9441, 2007 WL 1730093

District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided June 18, 2007·No. No. 1D07-1515·Published

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Having considered the appellant’s responses to this Court’s jurisdictional show cause orders, this appeal is hereby DIS[563]*563MISSED as premature. See Caufield v. Cantele, 837 So.2d 371, 375 (Fla.2002) (“[a] final judgment is one which ends the litigation between the parties and disposes of all issues involved such that no further action by the court will be necessary”).

LEWIS, POLSTON, and ROBERTS, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

Having considered the appellant’s responses to this Court’s jurisdictional show cause orders, this appeal is hereby DIS[563]*563MISSED as premature. See Caufield v. Cantele, 837 So.2d 371, 375 (Fla.2002) (“[a] final judgment is one which ends the litigation between the parties and disposes of all issues involved such that no further action by the court will be necessary”).

LEWIS, POLSTON, and ROBERTS, JJ., concur.

Cunningham v. Thompson, 958 So. 2d 562, 2007 Fla. App. LEXIS 9441, 2007 WL 1730093 (Fla. Ct. App. 2007).

Pincite

958 So. 2d 562 (Cunningham v. Thompson) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related