Cunningham v. Strom

87 S.E. 20, 144 Ga. 324, 1915 Ga. LEXIS 186
Supreme Court of Georgia·Decided November 13, 1915·Published·Cited by 4 cases

Opinion

Lumpkin, J.

In First National Bank of Forsyth v. Taylor, 138 Ga. 119 (74 S. E. 783), it was held that “The law embodied in the Civil Code, § 6152, does not in any ease authorize delay in tendering to a trial judge a bill of exceptions alleging error in a judgment rendered during a given term, for more than thirty days after the final adjournment of the court for that term.” A number of authorities were cited: and a motion to review and overrule three of them was denied.

[325]*325November 13, 1915. Action of ejectment; from Crisp superior court. Max E. Land, Pearson Ellis, and Hay good & Cutts, for plaintiffs in error. Little, Powell, Smith & Goldstein and Clayton Jones, contra.

la) A similar motion is made in the present case, and it is again denied.

(6) Under this decision, where, during the August term of the superior court, which adjourned on September 26, a verdict was directed, and a judgment entered, and a bill of exceptions thereto was tendered to the presiding judge on November 5, it was tendered too late; and the writ of error must be dismissed.

Writ of error dismissed.

All the Justices concur, except Beck, J., absent.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cunningham v. Strom, 87 S.E. 20, 144 Ga. 324, 1915 Ga. LEXIS 186 (Ga. 1915).

87 S.E. 20 (Cunningham v. Strom) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Taylor v. Cleghorn Bros.
168 S.E. 773 (Supreme Court of Georgia, 1933)
Cone v. Hunter
145 S.E. 912 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1928)
Birmingham Finance Co. v. Chisholm
134 S.E. 301 (Supreme Court of Georgia, 1926)
Lucas v. Hawkins
123 S.E. 749 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1924)