Cunningham v. Strom
This text of 87 S.E. 20 (Cunningham v. Strom) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Georgia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
In First National Bank of Forsyth v. Taylor, 138 Ga. 119 (74 S. E. 783), it was held that “The law embodied in the Civil Code, § 6152, does not in any ease authorize delay in tendering to a trial judge a bill of exceptions alleging error in a judgment rendered during a given term, for more than thirty days after the final adjournment of the court for that term.” A number of authorities were cited: and a motion to review and overrule three of them was denied.
la) A similar motion is made in the present case, and it is again denied.
(6) Under this decision, where, during the August term of the superior court, which adjourned on September 26, a verdict was directed, and a judgment entered, and a bill of exceptions thereto was tendered to the presiding judge on November 5, it was tendered too late; and the writ of error must be dismissed.
Writ of error dismissed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
87 S.E. 20, 144 Ga. 324, 1915 Ga. LEXIS 186, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/cunningham-v-strom-ga-1915.