Cunningham v. State

Washington Supreme Court

Cunningham v. State

414 P.3d 571, 190 Wash. 2d 1009

Washington Supreme Court·Decided April 4, 2018·No. No. 95346-5·Published

Opinion

¶ 1 Department II of the Court, composed of Chief Justice Fairhurst and Justices Madsen, Stephens, González and Yu, considered at its April 3, 2018, Motion Calendar whether review should be granted pursuant to RAP 13.4(b) and unanimously agreed that the following order be entered.

¶ 2 IT IS ORDERED:

¶ 3 That the petition for review is denied. The Petitioner's motion to supplement, motion for exhaustion of administrative remedies, and all other motions are also denied.

For the Court.

/s/ Fairhurst, C.J.CHIEF JUSTICE

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

¶ 1 Department II of the Court, composed of Chief Justice Fairhurst and Justices Madsen, Stephens, González and Yu, considered at its April 3, 2018, Motion Calendar whether review should be granted pursuant to RAP 13.4(b) and unanimously agreed that the following order be entered.

¶ 2 IT IS ORDERED:

¶ 3 That the petition for review is denied. The Petitioner's motion to supplement, motion for exhaustion of administrative remedies, and all other motions are also denied.

For the Court.

/s/ Fairhurst, C.J.CHIEF JUSTICE

Cunningham v. State, 414 P.3d 571, 190 Wash. 2d 1009 (Wash. 2018).

Pincite

414 P.3d 571 (Cunningham v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.