Cunningham v. State
249 S.W.2d 220, 1952 Tex. Crim. App. LEXIS 2258
Opinion
The offense is burglary; the punishment, 5 years.
No statement of facts and no bills of exception appear in the record.
Our State’s Attorney calls our attention to the fact that the word evidently intended to be “deprive” appears in the indictment spelled • “drprive”.
We do not think this affects the meaning of the indictment or in any way misleads the appellant.
Judgment of the trial court is affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cunningham v. State, 249 S.W.2d 220, 1952 Tex. Crim. App. LEXIS 2258 (Tex. 1952).
249 S.W.2d 220 (Cunningham v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Young v. State
267 S.W.2d 407 (Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas, 1954)