Cunningham v. State

134 S.W. 728, 61 Tex. Crim. 232, 1911 Tex. Crim. App. LEXIS 67
CourtCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas
DecidedFebruary 15, 1911
DocketNo. 949.
StatusPublished

This text of 134 S.W. 728 (Cunningham v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Cunningham v. State, 134 S.W. 728, 61 Tex. Crim. 232, 1911 Tex. Crim. App. LEXIS 67 (Tex. 1911).

Opinion

HARPER, Judge.

—In this case the appellant was charged with the offense of theft from the person. He was tried, adjudged guilty, and his punishment assessed at seven years confinement in the penitentiary.

There is no statement of facts in the record. In the absence of a statement of facts, if the charge is applicable to any state of facts that might be made by the testimony under the allegations of the indictment, on appeal it will be considered and assumed that the trial court submitted to the jury all the law applicable to the case. Mundine v. State, 50 Texas Crim. Rep., 97; Wright v. State, 37 Texas Crim. Rep., 146.

The charge of the court presents the law as applicable to the offense charged in the indictment, and the judgment of the lower court is affirmed.

Affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Wright v. State
38 S.W. 1004 (Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas, 1897)
Mundine v. State
97 S.W. 490 (Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas, 1906)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
134 S.W. 728, 61 Tex. Crim. 232, 1911 Tex. Crim. App. LEXIS 67, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/cunningham-v-state-texcrimapp-1911.