Cunningham v. State

134 S.W. 728, 61 Tex. Crim. 232, 1911 Tex. Crim. App. LEXIS 67
Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas·Decided February 15, 1911·No. No. 949.·Published

Opinion

HARPER, Judge.

—In this case the appellant was charged with the offense of theft from the person. He was tried, adjudged guilty, and his punishment assessed at seven years confinement in the penitentiary.

There is no statement of facts in the record. In the absence of a statement of facts, if the charge is applicable to any state of facts that might be made by the testimony under the allegations of the indictment, on appeal it will be considered and assumed that the trial court submitted to the jury all the law applicable to the case. Mundine v. State, 50 Texas Crim. Rep., 97; Wright v. State, 37 Texas Crim. Rep., 146.

The charge of the court presents the law as applicable to the offense charged in the indictment, and the judgment of the lower court is affirmed.

Affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cunningham v. State, 134 S.W. 728, 61 Tex. Crim. 232, 1911 Tex. Crim. App. LEXIS 67 (Tex. 1911).

134 S.W. 728 (Cunningham v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Wright v. State
38 S.W. 1004 (Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas, 1897)
Mundine v. State
97 S.W. 490 (Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas, 1906)