Cunningham v. State Plant Board of Florida

115 So. 2d 701
Supreme Court of Florida·Decided November 18, 1959·Published·Cited by 8 cases

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

This cause is before the court on petition for certiorari to review a decision of the District Court of Appeal, Second District, in Cunningham v. State Plant Board of Florida, Fla.App.1959, 112 So.2d 905. We have carefully examined the petition, as supplemented by supporting briefs and argument of counsel at the Bar of this court, and have concluded that the District Court of Appeal disposed of the matter with a decision which fails to collide with a prior decision of this court on the same point of law.

The petition for the writ of certiorari is, accordingly, denied.

THOMAS, C. J., and TERRELL, HOB-SON, ROBERTS, DREW, THORNAL and O’CONNELL, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cunningham v. State Plant Board of Florida, 115 So. 2d 701 (Fla. 1959).

115 So. 2d 701 (Cunningham v. State Plant Board of Florida) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Touchstone v. Touchstone
579 So. 2d 826 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1991)
DEPT. OF AGR. & CONSUMER SERV. v. Bonanno
568 So. 2d 24 (Supreme Court of Florida, 1990)
Florida Patient's Comp. Fund v. Von Stetina
474 So. 2d 783 (Supreme Court of Florida, 1985)
Kawasaki of Tampa, Inc. v. Calvin
348 So. 2d 897 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1977)
Gordon v. John Deere Co.
320 F. Supp. 293 (N.D. Florida, 1970)
Meier v. Grimes
202 So. 2d 870 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1967)
Heberle v. PRO Liquidating Company
186 So. 2d 280 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1966)
City of Lakeland v. Catinella
129 So. 2d 133 (Supreme Court of Florida, 1961)