Cunningham v. State

78 S.E. 780, 13 Ga. App. 80, 1913 Ga. App. LEXIS 45
Court of Appeals of Georgia·Decided July 8, 1913·No. 4969·Published

Opinion

Hill, C. J.

1. Where,- on the trial of an accusation under section 116 of the Penal Code, which makes it a misdemeanor for a father wilfully and voluntarily to abandon his child, leaving it in a dependent condition, the sole issue was as to his marriage to the mother, she was a competent witness to prove not only the abandonment, but also the marriage. Murphy v. State, 50 Ga. 150.

2. Where a marriage in this State is in question on a trial for violation of section 116 of the Penal Code, proof by one witness of the marriage in fact is sufficient, without evidence as to the authority of the person officiating, or of a compliance with the statutory requirements on the subject of marriage. Dale v. State, 88 Ga. 552, 556 (15 S. E. 287).

3. No specific error of law is complained of, and the evidence supports the verdict. Judgment aflvrmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cunningham v. State, 78 S.E. 780, 13 Ga. App. 80, 1913 Ga. App. LEXIS 45 (Ga. Ct. App. 1913).

78 S.E. 780 (Cunningham v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Murphy v. State
50 Ga. 150 (Supreme Court of Georgia, 1873)
Dale v. State
15 S.E. 287 (Supreme Court of Georgia, 1892)