Home/District Court of Appeal of Florida/Cunningham v. State

Cunningham v. State

849 So. 2d 1125, 2003 Fla. App. LEXIS 10370, 2003 WL 21554565
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Cunningham v. State. Read the opinion of the Court — 838 So. 2d 627 →
District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided July 11, 2003·No. No. 1D03-1774·Published

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

We dismiss this appeal for lack of jurisdiction. The motion for reduction of sentence pursuant to Florida Rule of Criminal Procedure 3.800(c), is addressed to the discretion of the trial court. Therefore, this Court has no jurisdiction to review the correctness of the trial court’s disposition of the motion. Daniels v. State, 568 So.2d 63 (Fla. 1st DCA 1990). This dismissal is without prejudice to any right the appellant might have to seek a belated appeal of his motion to withdraw his plea pursuant to Florida Rule of Appellate Procedure 9.141(c).

DISMISSED.

ERVIN, PADOVANO and POLSTON, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cunningham v. State, 849 So. 2d 1125, 2003 Fla. App. LEXIS 10370, 2003 WL 21554565 (Fla. Ct. App. 2003).

849 So. 2d 1125 (Cunningham v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Daniels v. State
568 So. 2d 63 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1990)