Cunningham v. State

448 So. 2d 68, 1984 Fla. App. LEXIS 12672
CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida
DecidedApril 10, 1984
DocketNo. 83-1657
StatusPublished
Cited by1 cases

This text of 448 So. 2d 68 (Cunningham v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Cunningham v. State, 448 So. 2d 68, 1984 Fla. App. LEXIS 12672 (Fla. Ct. App. 1984).

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

The trial court’s written order revoking the defendant’s probation does not conform to its oral pronouncement finding that the defendant had not violated conditions 6 and 9, and upon remand, these findings should be stricken from the written order. In all other respects, the order revoking probation is affirmed.

Affirmed as modified.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Williams v. Pan American World Airways, Inc.
448 So. 2d 68 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1984)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
448 So. 2d 68, 1984 Fla. App. LEXIS 12672, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/cunningham-v-state-fladistctapp-1984.