Cunningham v. State
448 So. 2d 68, 1984 Fla. App. LEXIS 12672
District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided April 10, 1984·No. No. 83-1657·Published·Cited by 1 cases
Opinion
The trial court’s written order revoking the defendant’s probation does not conform to its oral pronouncement finding that the defendant had not violated conditions 6 and 9, and upon remand, these findings should be stricken from the written order. In all other respects, the order revoking probation is affirmed.
Affirmed as modified.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cunningham v. State, 448 So. 2d 68, 1984 Fla. App. LEXIS 12672 (Fla. Ct. App. 1984).
448 So. 2d 68 (Cunningham v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Williams v. Pan American World Airways, Inc.
448 So. 2d 68 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1984)