Cunningham v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Cunningham v. State

337 So. 2d 993, 1976 Fla. App. LEXIS 15515

CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida

DecidedJune 18, 1976

DocketNo. 75-1122

StatusPublished

Cited by2 cases

This text of 337 So. 2d 993 (Cunningham v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Cunningham v. State, 337 So. 2d 993, 1976 Fla. App. LEXIS 15515 (Fla. Ct. App. 1976).

Pincite

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

This appeal brings up for review a judgment of conviction of indirect criminal contempt entered in proceedings filed under RCrP Rule 3.840.

We have examined the briefs and record and heard argument of counsel. The evidence was conflicting. However, there is competent substantial evidence to support the judgment of conviction. In such a situation, we should not substitute our judgment for that of the trial judge, who heard the testimony of and saw the demeanor of the witnesses and the appellant, on a question of fact. 2 Fla.Jur., Appeals, Sections 346 and 347, pages 721-730, and authorities cited.

The other points raised on appeal have been considered and found to be without merit.

Accordingly, the judgment appealed from is affirmed.

CROSS and MAGER, JJ., and SMITH, D. C., Associate Judge, concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI