Cunningham v. State

Supreme Court of Arkansas

Cunningham v. State

471 S.W.2d 777, 251 Ark. 277

CourtSupreme Court of Arkansas

DecidedOctober 25, 1971

Docket5650

StatusPublished

Cited by2 cases

This text of 471 S.W.2d 777 (Cunningham v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Arkansas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Cunningham v. State, 471 S.W.2d 777, 251 Ark. 277 (Ark. 1971).

Pincite

Opinion

Conley Byrd, Justice.

The only point raised in this appeaJ from the trial court’s denial of appellant Rudolph Cunningham’s post conviction relief is the assertion that he was denied a' fair trial because the deputy prosecuting attorney threatened one of the State’s witnesses with perjury if she did not tell the truth. The witness, a relative of petitioner, testified that though the threat was made, she only told the truth and nothing but the truth.

We find no merit in the contention.

Affirmed.

Fogleman, J., not participating.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI