Cunningham v. Spokane Hydraulic Mining Co.
58 P. 1119, 21 Wash. 709, 1899 Wash. LEXIS 360
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Cunningham v. Spokane Hydraulic Mining Co.. Read the opinion of the Court — 20 Wash. 450 →
Opinion
This is the third time that this case has been before the court, and an investigation of the record convinces us that all the controlling questions now involved have been passed upon in the prior decisions rendered. 18 Wash. 524 (52 Pac. 235) ; 20 Wash. 450 (55 Pac. 756). In addition, with our view of the law governing this case and the testimony introduced, there seems to be no defense to the action, either equitable or legal. The judgment will, therefore, be affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cunningham v. Spokane Hydraulic Mining Co., 58 P. 1119, 21 Wash. 709, 1899 Wash. LEXIS 360 (Wash. 1899).
58 P. 1119 (Cunningham v. Spokane Hydraulic Mining Co.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Cunningham v. Spokane Hydraulic Co.
52 P. 235 (Washington Supreme Court, 1898)
Cunningham v. Spokane Hydraulic Mining Co.
55 P. 756 (Washington Supreme Court, 1898)