Cunningham v. Skinner
This text of 4 P. 373 (Cunningham v. Skinner) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering California Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
The denial that the plaintiff is the owner of the personal property described in the complaint, and the allegation that the defendant “has not sufficient information or belief upon the subject to enable him to answer” the allegation of the plaintiff that he is entitled to the possession of said property, “ and on that ground he (defendant) denies the same,” is sufficient to put in issue the allegation of the plaintiff that he is the owner, and entitled to the possession of said property; and the court erred in holding on the trial that it was not. (Code Civ. Proc. § 437.) Judgment reversed.
Hearing in Bank denied.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
4 P. 373, 65 Cal. 385, 1884 Cal. LEXIS 565, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/cunningham-v-skinner-cal-1884.