Cunningham v. Rice
This text of 28 Ga. 30 (Cunningham v. Rice) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Georgia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
[32]*32 By the Court.
delivering the opinion.
In Mygatt et al. vs. Goetchius, (20 Geo. Rep. 350,) this court held that when taking the bill and answer, the structure complained of will not prima facie, constitute a nuisance — the injunction will not be continued; but that the party will proceed at his peril — the whole subject being under the control of the jury at the hearing.
We re-affirm the doctrines of that case, and agree that it fully covers and controls this. Indeed, this is a much weaker case than that.
Judgment reversed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
28 Ga. 30, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/cunningham-v-rice-ga-1859.