Cunningham v. PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION OF THE TOWN OF PLAINVILLE

888 A.2d 83, 276 Conn. 915
CourtSupreme Court of Connecticut
DecidedNovember 3, 2005
StatusPublished

This text of 888 A.2d 83 (Cunningham v. PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION OF THE TOWN OF PLAINVILLE) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Connecticut primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Cunningham v. PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION OF THE TOWN OF PLAINVILLE, 888 A.2d 83, 276 Conn. 915 (Colo. 2005).

Opinion

888 A.2d 83 (2005)
276 Conn. 915

William E. CUNNINGHAM et al.
v.
PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION OF the TOWN OF PLAINVILLE et al.

Supreme Court of Connecticut.

Decided November 3, 2005.

William T. Barrante, in support of the petition.

Robert A. Ziegler, Jeffrey M. Knickerbocker, Plainville, and Richard M. Segulic, in opposition.

The plaintiffs' petition for certification for appeal from the Appellate Court, 90 Conn.App. 273, 876 A.2d 1257 (2005), is denied.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Cunningham v. Planning & Zoning Commission
876 A.2d 1257 (Connecticut Appellate Court, 2005)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
888 A.2d 83, 276 Conn. 915, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/cunningham-v-planning-and-zoning-commission-of-the-town-of-plainville-conn-2005.