Cunningham v. Nilson
84 N.Y.S. 669
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Cunningham v. Nilson. Read the opinion of the Court — 84 N.Y.S. 668 →
Opinion
Upon a former appeal in this case (84 N. Y. Supp. 668) it was held that the evidence presented a question of fact which should have been presented to the jury. Substantially the same state of facts were shown upon the trial from which the present appeal comes up, and the trial judge,, sitting in place of a jury, has decided in favor of the defendant. The judgment must therefore be affirmed, with costs.
Judgment affirmed, with costs. All concur.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cunningham v. Nilson, 84 N.Y.S. 669 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1903).
84 N.Y.S. 669 (Cunningham v. Nilson) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Cunningham v. Nilson
84 N.Y.S. 668 (Appellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York, 1903)