Cunningham v. Miller

Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO WESTERN DIVISION

Carol Yvonne Cunningham,

Plaintiff,

v. Case No. 1:24cv603

Sue Miller,

Defendant.

ORDER

This matter is before the Court on the Report and Recommendation (“R&R”) filed by the Magistrate Judge on February 18, 2025 (Doc. 9). Proper notice has been given to the parties under 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(C), including notice that the parties may forfeit rights on appeal if they failed to file objections to the R&R in a timely manner. United States v. Walters, 638 F.2d 947 (6th Cir. 1981). No objections to the Magistrate Judge’s R&R (Doc. 9) have been filed and the time to do so has expired. Accordingly, it is ORDERED that the R&R (Doc. 51) of the Magistrate Judge is hereby ADOPTED. Consistent with the recommendation by the Magistrate Judge, Plaintiff’s motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis on appeal (Doc. 8) is DENIED. IT IS SO ORDERED.

s/Michael R. Barrett Michael R. Barrett, Judge United States District Court