Cunningham v. Marshall

143 N.W. 197, 94 Neb. 302, 1913 Neb. LEXIS 238
CourtNebraska Supreme Court
DecidedSeptember 26, 1913
DocketNo. 16,969
StatusPublished
Cited by25 cases

This text of 143 N.W. 197 (Cunningham v. Marshall) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Nebraska Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Cunningham v. Marshall, 143 N.W. 197, 94 Neb. 302, 1913 Neb. LEXIS 238 (Neb. 1913).

Opinion

Rose, J.

This is a suit in equity to establish homestead rights in 240 acres of land in Lancaster county. The trial court dismissed the case after a full hearing, and plaintiffs have appealed.

Felix Cunningham, a married man, held the legal title [303]*303to the land, and, describing himself as a single man, deeded it to Frank McKelvie, May 5, 1897. For full value the latter deeded the land to Joseph H. Marshall, who willed it to defendant, his wife. He died June 15, 1907. Felix Cunningham is dead. Four of his five children are plaintiffs. His wife was divorced, and is not a party to this action. During the time covered by the asserted acquisition and occupancy of the homestead pleaded, the wife and all of the children, except the oldest son, lived in New York, and never saw the premises in controversy. A fair interpretation of all of the evidence leads inevitably to the conclusion that neither the father nor his oldest son ever acquired, occupied or claimed, when in possession, a homestead in the land, within the meaning of the homestead law. An analysis of the evidence upon which this conclusion rests would neither benefit the parties nor make an addition to the law, and will not be attempted. For failure to establish this material fact, the case of plaintiffs entirely fails. The decree conforms not only to the law, but to the demands of equity.

Affirmed.

Reese, C. J., Letton and Fawcett, JJ., not sitting.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Chambers v. Bringenberg
309 Neb. 888 (Nebraska Supreme Court, 2021)
Duda v. Beben
31 N.W.2d 603 (Wisconsin Supreme Court, 1948)
Engen v. Union State Bank
236 N.W. 741 (Nebraska Supreme Court, 1931)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
143 N.W. 197, 94 Neb. 302, 1913 Neb. LEXIS 238, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/cunningham-v-marshall-neb-1913.