Cunningham v. Manhattan Railway Co.
27 Jones & S. 577, 59 N.Y. Sup. Ct. 577
This text of 27 Jones & S. 577 (Cunningham v. Manhattan Railway Co.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering The Superior Court of New York City primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Bluebook
Cunningham v. Manhattan Railway Co., 27 Jones & S. 577, 59 N.Y. Sup. Ct. 577 (N.Y. Super. Ct. 1891).
Opinion
The main question involved was as to the sufficiency of the evidence to uphold the judgment. The Court (Truax, J., writing, Dugro, J., concurring) held the evidence insufficient and reversed the judgment and ordered a new trial, with costs to the appellants to abide the event,'
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bluebook (online)
27 Jones & S. 577, 59 N.Y. Sup. Ct. 577, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/cunningham-v-manhattan-railway-co-nysuperctnyc-1891.