Cunningham v. Manhattan Railway Co.
27 Jones & S. 577, 59 N.Y. Sup. Ct. 577
Opinion
The main question involved was as to the sufficiency of the evidence to uphold the judgment. The Court (Truax, J., writing, Dugro, J., concurring) held the evidence insufficient and reversed the judgment and ordered a new trial, with costs to the appellants to abide the event,'
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cunningham v. Manhattan Railway Co., 27 Jones & S. 577, 59 N.Y. Sup. Ct. 577 (N.Y. Super. Ct. 1891).
27 Jones & S. 577 (Cunningham v. Manhattan Railway Co.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.