Home/District Court of Appeal of Florida/Cunningham v. Kohr

Cunningham v. Kohr

199 So. 3d 1136, 2016 Fla. App. LEXIS 14536, 2016 WL 5477892
CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida
DecidedSeptember 28, 2016
DocketNo. 1D16-3094
StatusPublished

This text of 199 So. 3d 1136 (Cunningham v. Kohr) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Cunningham v. Kohr, 199 So. 3d 1136, 2016 Fla. App. LEXIS 14536, 2016 WL 5477892 (Fla. Ct. App. 2016).

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Upon consideration of appellant’s response, and having determined that the appeal is untimely because the motion for rehearing was not timely served, see Fla. [1137]*1137Prob. R. 5.020(d), the appeal is hereby DISMISSED.

RAY, KELSEY, and WINOKUR, 33., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
199 So. 3d 1136, 2016 Fla. App. LEXIS 14536, 2016 WL 5477892, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/cunningham-v-kohr-fladistctapp-2016.