Cunningham v. King
This text of 183 S.E.2d 157 (Cunningham v. King) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Virginia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
The trial court entered judgment on a jury verdict in favor of plaintiff, Betty Ann King, against defendant, Eva Lee Cunningham, for personal injuries resulting from an automobile accident. Mrs. Cunningham appeals, contending that Mrs. King’s contributory negligence barred a recovery.
Automobiles operated by Mrs. Cunningham and by Mrs. King collided at an intersection in the Town of Abingdon. The evidence and physical facts show that Mrs. Cunningham’s automobile, which was approaching the intersection from Mrs. King’s right, was in plain view and dangerously near when Mrs. King’s automobile entered the intersection after stopping in obedience to a stop sign. Yet Mrs. King admitted that she did not see Airs. Cunningham’s automobile until the two cars collided. Mrs. King was therefore guilty of contributory negligence, barring her right to recover. See Sayre v. Shields, 209 Va. 409, 164 S.E.2d 665 (1968).
Reversed and final judgment.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
183 S.E.2d 157, 212 Va. 126, 1971 Va. LEXIS 310, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/cunningham-v-king-va-1971.