Cunningham v. Jackson

12 Ohio Cir. Dec. 722
Ohio Circuit Courts·Decided July 1, 1898·Published

Opinion

Swing, J.

Upon the authority of Sayler v. Simpson, 45 Ohio St., 141, 147 [12 N. E. Rep. 181]; Barr v. Chapman, 3 Circ. Dec. 36 (5 R. 74), and Callahan v. Ice & Refrigerating Co., 7 Circ. Dec. 349 (13 R. 479), we are ¡ of the opinion that when the assignment was made the right to admin-I ister and sell the real estate .in controversy was vested exclusively in the i probate court, and this court will not therefore order a sale of the real I estate. The same judgment should be entered in this court as was l entered in the court of common pleas.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cunningham v. Jackson, 12 Ohio Cir. Dec. 722 (Ohio Super. Ct. 1898).

12 Ohio Cir. Dec. 722 (Cunningham v. Jackson) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Downing v. Funk
5 Rawle 69 (Supreme Court of Pennsylvania, 1835)