Cunningham v. Jackson

Ohio Circuit Courts

Cunningham v. Jackson

12 Ohio Cir. Dec. 722

DecidedJuly 1, 1898

StatusPublished

This text of 12 Ohio Cir. Dec. 722 (Cunningham v. Jackson) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Ohio Circuit Courts primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Cunningham v. Jackson, 12 Ohio Cir. Dec. 722 (Ohio Super. Ct. 1898).

Pincite

Opinion

Swing, J.

Upon the authority of Sayler v. Simpson, 45 Ohio St., 141, 147 [12 N. E. Rep. 181]; Barr v. Chapman, 3 Circ. Dec. 36 (5 R. 74), and Callahan v. Ice & Refrigerating Co., 7 Circ. Dec. 349 (13 R. 479), we are ¡ of the opinion that when the assignment was made the right to admin-I ister and sell the real estate .in controversy was vested exclusively in the i probate court, and this court will not therefore order a sale of the real I estate. The same judgment should be entered in this court as was l entered in the court of common pleas.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Swing, J.

Upon the authority of Sayler v. Simpson, 45 Ohio St., 141, 147 [12 N. E. Rep. 181]; Barr v. Chapman, 3 Circ. Dec. 36 (5 R. 74), and Callahan v. Ice & Refrigerating Co., 7 Circ. Dec. 349 (13 R. 479), we are ¡ of the opinion that when the assignment was made the right to admin-I ister and sell the real estate .in controversy was vested exclusively in the i probate court, and this court will not therefore order a sale of the real I estate. The same judgment should be entered in this court as was l entered in the court of common pleas.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

12 Ohio Cir. Dec. 722, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/cunningham-v-jackson-ohiocirct-1898.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack