Cunningham v. Hanshew

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Cunningham v. Hanshew

58 N.Y.S. 1138

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedMay 2, 1899

StatusPublished

This text of 58 N.Y.S. 1138 (Cunningham v. Hanshew) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Cunningham v. Hanshew, 58 N.Y.S. 1138 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1899).

Pincite

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

By the tenant continuing in possession after the 1st of May, and by the receipt by the landlord of some of the installments of the rent, the rights of the parties Re-came absolutely fixed on both sides. There was a tenancy for another year. There was no ne[1139]*1139cessity for the production of the deeds to the tenant. The plaintiff established a clear right to recover. Judgment reversed, and a new trial granted; costs to abide the event.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

By the tenant continuing in possession after the 1st of May, and by the receipt by the landlord of some of the installments of the rent, the rights of the parties Re-came absolutely fixed on both sides. There was a tenancy for another year. There was no ne[1139]*1139cessity for the production of the deeds to the tenant. The plaintiff established a clear right to recover. Judgment reversed, and a new trial granted; costs to abide the event.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

58 N.Y.S. 1138, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/cunningham-v-hanshew-nyappdiv-1899.