Home/Supreme Court/Cunningham v. Golden

Cunningham v. Golden

466 U.S. 966, 104 S. Ct. 2336, 80 L. Ed. 2d 810, 52 U.S.L.W. 3827, 1984 U.S. LEXIS 2099
CourtSupreme Court of the United States
DecidedMay 14, 1984
DocketNo. 83-357
StatusPublished
Cited by2 cases

This text of 466 U.S. 966 (Cunningham v. Golden) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of the United States primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Cunningham v. Golden, 466 U.S. 966, 104 S. Ct. 2336, 80 L. Ed. 2d 810, 52 U.S.L.W. 3827, 1984 U.S. LEXIS 2099 (1984).

Opinion

Appeal from Ct. App. Tenn. dismissed for want of substantial federal question.

Justice White and Justice Blackmun would note probable jurisdiction and set case for oral argument.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Evans v. Steelman
970 S.W.2d 431 (Tennessee Supreme Court, 1998)
Michael Scott Evans v. Karen Marie Bisson Steeman - Dissenting
Court of Appeals of Tennessee, 1996

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
466 U.S. 966, 104 S. Ct. 2336, 80 L. Ed. 2d 810, 52 U.S.L.W. 3827, 1984 U.S. LEXIS 2099, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/cunningham-v-golden-scotus-1984.