Cunningham v. Drew

553 F. App'x 323
CourtCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
DecidedJanuary 29, 2014
DocketNo. 13-7150
StatusPublished

This text of 553 F. App'x 323 (Cunningham v. Drew) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Cunningham v. Drew, 553 F. App'x 323 (4th Cir. 2014).

Opinion

Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

Eugene Jerome Cunningham appeals from the district court’s order denying his motion to void its earlier judgment under Fed.R.Civ.P. 60(b)(4). We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. See Wendt v. Leonard, 431 F.3d 410, 412-13 (4th Cir.2005) (providing standard in Rule 60(b)(4) action). Accordingly, we affirm the challenged order. We dispense ■with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Wendt v. Leonard
431 F.3d 410 (Fourth Circuit, 2005)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
553 F. App'x 323, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/cunningham-v-drew-ca4-2014.