Cunningham v. Cupp

Court of Appeals of Oregon

Cunningham v. Cupp

476 P.2d 824, 4 Or. App. 32, 1970 Ore. App. LEXIS 393

DecidedNovember 16, 1970

StatusPublished

This text of 476 P.2d 824 (Cunningham v. Cupp) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Oregon primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Cunningham v. Cupp, 476 P.2d 824, 4 Or. App. 32, 1970 Ore. App. LEXIS 393 (Or. Ct. App. 1970).

Pincite

Opinion

PER CURIAM

This is an appeal from an order denying post-conviction relief. In 1968, petitioner, while represented [33]*33by counsel, plead guilty to a felony charge and was given a prison sentence.

In his post-conviction hearing he testified that his attorney wrongly induced him to plead guilty. His attorney testified to the contrary. The trial court believed the attorney.

“What actually transpired is a question of fact for the trial court * * *. If the evidence sustains such historical factual findings they will not be disturbed by this court * * Ball v. Gladden, 250 Or 485, 487, 443 P2d 621 (1968).

Affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI