Cunningham v. Cunningham

Supreme Court of New Hampshire

Cunningham v. Cunningham

117 A. 815, 80 N.H. 592, 1922 N.H. LEXIS 62

DecidedJune 6, 1922

StatusPublished

This text of 117 A. 815 (Cunningham v. Cunningham) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of New Hampshire primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Cunningham v. Cunningham, 117 A. 815, 80 N.H. 592, 1922 N.H. LEXIS 62 (N.H. 1922).

Pincite

Opinion

Per Curiam.

As the $325 with which the appellant seeks to charge the appellee was paid to the administrator for the specific purpose of paying funeral bills and other expenses, the refusal of the court to ■charge the administrator with this sum as part of the damages distributable under P. S., c. 191, s. 13, presents no question of law, no exception being taken to the sufficiency of the evidence to sus-tain such finding.

Exception overruled.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Per Curiam.

As the $325 with which the appellant seeks to charge the appellee was paid to the administrator for the specific purpose of paying funeral bills and other expenses, the refusal of the court to ■charge the administrator with this sum as part of the damages distributable under P. S., c. 191, s. 13, presents no question of law, no exception being taken to the sufficiency of the evidence to sus-tain such finding.

Exception overruled.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

117 A. 815, 80 N.H. 592, 1922 N.H. LEXIS 62, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/cunningham-v-cunningham-nh-1922.