Cunningham v. City of Fort Collins

46 Colo. 473
Supreme Court of Colorado·Decided September 15, 1909·No. No. 6216·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

Chiee Justice Steele

delivered the opinion of the court:

The defendant was found guilty of violating an ordinance of the city of Fort Collins. He has appealed to this court.

[474] It is said that the testimony failed to show that the defendant sold liquor in the city of Fort Collins, or within one mile of its outer boundaries. We are of the opinion, this being a civil action, that the proof was sufficient to warrant the submission of the case to the jury. No exception nor objection to the instruction was preserved by bill of exception. We are of the opinion that the assignments of error are without merit, and the court correctly adjudged the defendant guilty, and the judgment will be affirmed.

Affirmed.

Mr. Justice Campbell and Mr. Justice Musser ' concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cunningham v. City of Fort Collins, 46 Colo. 473 (Colo. 1909).

46 Colo. 473 (Cunningham v. City of Fort Collins) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

LeDoux v. Horowitz
201 P. 880 (Supreme Court of Colorado, 1921)