Cunningham v. Carrico

11 Ky. Op. 102, 2 Ky. L. Rptr. 310, 1881 Ky. LEXIS 165
Court of Appeals of Kentucky·Decided March 10, 1881·Published

Opinion

Opinion by

Judge Pryor:

The recital in the note as to the interest was evidently intended to indicate the interest the note should bear from date until its maturity. The note is dated the 6th of January, 1876, and payable twelve months after date with ten per cent, interest per annum.' This is a contract to pay in- twelve months $428, with ten per cent, interest from date, not until paid, but until the maturity of the note. The identical question was settled by this court in Rilling v. Thompson, 12 Bush (Ky.) 310.

Judgment' reversed and cause remanded for further proceedings.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cunningham v. Carrico, 11 Ky. Op. 102, 2 Ky. L. Rptr. 310, 1881 Ky. LEXIS 165 (Ky. Ct. App. 1881).

11 Ky. Op. 102 (Cunningham v. Carrico) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Rilling v. Thompson
75 Ky. 310 (Court of Appeals of Kentucky, 1876)