Cunningham v. Carrico

11 Ky. Op. 102, 2 Ky. L. Rptr. 310, 1881 Ky. LEXIS 165
CourtCourt of Appeals of Kentucky
DecidedMarch 10, 1881
StatusPublished

This text of 11 Ky. Op. 102 (Cunningham v. Carrico) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Kentucky primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Cunningham v. Carrico, 11 Ky. Op. 102, 2 Ky. L. Rptr. 310, 1881 Ky. LEXIS 165 (Ky. Ct. App. 1881).

Opinion

Opinion by

Judge Pryor:

The recital in the note as to the interest was evidently intended to indicate the interest the note should bear from date until its maturity. The note is dated the 6th of January, 1876, and payable twelve months after date with ten per cent, interest per annum.' This is a contract to pay in- twelve months $428, with ten per cent, interest from date, not until paid, but until the maturity of the note. The identical question was settled by this court in Rilling v. Thompson, 12 Bush (Ky.) 310.

Judgment' reversed and cause remanded for further proceedings.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Rilling v. Thompson
75 Ky. 310 (Court of Appeals of Kentucky, 1876)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
11 Ky. Op. 102, 2 Ky. L. Rptr. 310, 1881 Ky. LEXIS 165, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/cunningham-v-carrico-kyctapp-1881.