Cunningham v. Beasley

Opinion

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO WESTERN DIVISION - CINCINNATI CAROL YVONNE CUNNINGHAM, : Case No. 1:24-cv-606 Plaintiff, □ Judge Matthew W. McFarland Magistrate Judge Karen L. Litkovitz v. : MARY BEASLEY, Defendant.

ORDER ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION (Doc. 4)

The Court has reviewed the Report and Recommendation of United States Magistrate Judge Karen L. Litkovitz (Doc. 4), to whom this case is referred. Noting that

no objections have been filed and the time for filing such objections under Fed. R. Civ. P. 72(b) has expired, the Court hereby ADOPTS the Report and Recommendation in its entirety and ORDERS the following: 1. The Complaint is DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE pursuant to 28 US.C. § 1915(e)(2)(B); 2. The Court CERTIFIES pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915(a) that an appeal of this Order would not be taken in good faith and therefore DENIES Plaintiff leave

to appeal in forma pauperis. Plaintiff remains free to apply to proceed in forma pauperis in the Court of Appeals. See Callihan v. Schneider, 178 F.3d 800, 803 (6th Cir. 1999); and

3. This case is TERMINATED from the Court’s docket. IT IS SO ORDERED. UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO Wt We Heda □□ By: ° JUDGE MATTHEW W. McFARLAND