Home/Supreme Court of South Carolina/Cunningham v. Baker

Cunningham v. Baker

2 Nott & McC. 399, 11 S.C.L. 399
Supreme Court of South Carolina·Decided May 15, 1820·Published

Opinion

The opinion of the Court was delivered by

ColcocK, J.

My brethren are of opinion, that if the administrator thinks proper to sue within the time, the discount must be allowed, for it is to be considered more as a payment than a demand of a debt. The motion is granted.

Nott, Johnson, HugeR and Gantt, JJ., concurred. Richardson; J., dissented.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cunningham v. Baker, 2 Nott & McC. 399, 11 S.C.L. 399 (S.C. 1820).

2 Nott & McC. 399 (Cunningham v. Baker) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.