Cunningham v. Anchor Hocking Corp.

582 So. 2d 173, 1991 Fla. App. LEXIS 7404, 1991 WL 133407
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Cunningham v. Anchor Hocking Corp.. Read the opinion of the Court — 558 So. 2d 93
District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided July 18, 1991·No. No. 89-2072·Published

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

This is an appeal from an order awarding defendants/appellees costs. That order was entered subsequent to a final order dismissing with prejudice the multi-count complaint of plaintiffs/appellants. An appeal was taken to this court from the order of dismissal. Subsequently, the instant appeal was taken to this court from the costs order. In light of the court’s disposition of the dismissal order in Cunningham v. Anchor Hocking Corporation, 558 So.2d 93 (Fla. 1st DCA 1990), rev. denied, 574 So.2d 139 (Fla.1991), we reverse the order awarding costs.

REVERSED.

NIMMONS and ALLEN, JJ., and WENTWORTH, Senior Judge, concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cunningham v. Anchor Hocking Corp., 582 So. 2d 173, 1991 Fla. App. LEXIS 7404, 1991 WL 133407 (Fla. Ct. App. 1991).

582 So. 2d 173 (Cunningham v. Anchor Hocking Corp.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Cunningham v. Anchor Hocking Corp.
558 So. 2d 93 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1990)