Cunningham, Gregory Demon
This text of Cunningham, Gregory Demon (Cunningham, Gregory Demon) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
IN THE COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS OF TEXAS NO. WR-88,665-01
EX PARTE GREGORY DEMON CUNNINGHAM, Applicant
ON APPLICATION FOR A WRIT OF HABEAS CORPUS CAUSE NO. 31438-A IN THE 3RD DISTRICT COURT FROM ANDERSON COUNTY
Per curiam.
ORDER
Pursuant to the provisions of Article 11.07 of the Texas Code of Criminal Procedure, the
clerk of the trial court transmitted to this Court this application for a writ of habeas corpus. Ex parte
Young, 418 S.W.2d 824, 826 (Tex. Crim. App. 1967). Applicant was convicted of evading arrest
in 2014 and was sentenced to three years’ imprisonment. He contends that his sentence has
discharged but that he is still being confined in the Anderson County jail.
According to Applicant, he was released to parole in 2015, and he states that he is now being
confined in the county jail pursuant to a parole-violation (a/k/a “blue”) warrant that was executed
in December 2016. According to the General Counsel’s Office for the Department of Criminal
Justice, the blue warrant was withdrawn on April 23, 2018, and the three-year sentence discharged 2
on May 1, 2018. Applicant filed this habeas application complaining of his continued incarceration
in the Anderson County jail. The State did not respond to the habeas application, there is no relevant
information in the habeas application forwarded to this Court resolving the issue, and there are no
findings from the trial court.
Applicant has alleged facts that, if true, might entitle him to relief. Ex parte Spann, 132
S.W.3d 390 (Tex. Crim. App. 2004). In these circumstances, additional facts are needed. As we
held in Ex parte Rodriguez, 334 S.W.2d 294, 294 (Tex. Crim. App. 1960), the trial court is the
appropriate forum for findings of fact.
The trial court shall order the Sheriff of Anderson County to provide information regarding
the reason for Applicant’s continued confinement. To do so, the trial court may order an affidavit,
depositions, interrogatories, or a hearing. If the trial court elects to hold a hearing, it shall determine
whether Applicant is indigent. If Applicant is indigent and wishes to be represented by counsel, the
trial court shall appoint an attorney to represent Applicant at the hearing. TEX . CODE CRIM . PROC.
art. 26.04.
The trial court shall make findings of fact and conclusions of law regarding whether
Applicant should be released from the Anderson County jail. The trial court shall also make any
other findings of fact and conclusions of law that it deems relevant and appropriate to the disposition
of Applicant’s claim for habeas corpus relief.
This application will be held in abeyance until the trial court has resolved the fact issues. The
issues shall be resolved within 15 days of this order. A supplemental transcript containing all
affidavits and interrogatories or the transcription of the court reporter’s notes from any hearing or
deposition, along with the trial court’s supplemental findings of fact and conclusions of law, shall 3
be forwarded to this Court within 30 days of the date of this order. Any extensions of time must be
requested by the trial court and shall be obtained from this Court.
Filed: August 1, 2018 Do not publish
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Cunningham, Gregory Demon, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/cunningham-gregory-demon-texcrimapp-2018.