Cunningham Construction Co. v. Morgan

156 N.E. 524, 86 Ind. App. 387, 1927 Ind. App. LEXIS 121
CourtIndiana Court of Appeals
DecidedMay 20, 1927
DocketNo. 12,921.
StatusPublished
Cited by7 cases

This text of 156 N.E. 524 (Cunningham Construction Co. v. Morgan) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Indiana Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Cunningham Construction Co. v. Morgan, 156 N.E. 524, 86 Ind. App. 387, 1927 Ind. App. LEXIS 121 (Ind. Ct. App. 1927).

Opinion

Remy, J. —

Appellee, having received an injury while in the employment of appellant, filed with the Industrial Board his application for compensation. Contending that appellee was not entitled to compensation because of wilful misconduct, within §8 of the Compensation Act (Acts 1919 p. 158, §9453 Burns 192b), appellant presented the issue by a special answer. No other issue being presented, a hearing resulted in an award for appellee, from which this appeal is prosecuted.

The question was one of fact for the Industrial Board. There is competent evidence to sustain the award.

Affirmed.

Dausman, J., absent.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Taylor v. Taylor
632 N.E.2d 808 (Indiana Court of Appeals, 1994)
Beatty v. Beatty
555 N.E.2d 184 (Indiana Court of Appeals, 1990)
Weber v. Weber
170 Ohio St. (N.S.) 567 (Ohio Supreme Court, 1960)
Helmick v. Industrial Accident Commission
116 P.2d 658 (California Court of Appeal, 1941)
American Steel Foundries v. Fisher
17 N.E.2d 840 (Indiana Court of Appeals, 1938)
Clarke v. Industrial Accident Commission
262 P. 471 (California Court of Appeal, 1927)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
156 N.E. 524, 86 Ind. App. 387, 1927 Ind. App. LEXIS 121, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/cunningham-construction-co-v-morgan-indctapp-1927.