CUNMULAJ v. Chaney

771 N.W.2d 770

Michigan Supreme Court·Decided September 11, 2009·No. 138390·Published

Opinion

771 N.W.2d 770 (2009)

Sherif CUNMULAJ and Dawn Cunmulaj, Plaintiffs-Appellants,
v.
Kristen CHANEY and Harold Schott, Defendants-Appellees.
Sherif Cunmulaj and Dawn Cunmulaj, Plaintiffs-Appellants,
v.
Michigan State University, Defendant-Appellee.

Docket Nos. 138390, 138391. COA Nos. 282264, 282265.

Supreme Court of Michigan.

September 11, 2009.

Order

On order of the Court, the motion for miscellaneous relief is GRANTED. The motion for reconsideration of this Court's May 27, 2009 order is considered, and it is DENIED, because it does not appear that the order was entered erroneously.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

771 N.W.2d 770 (2009)

Sherif CUNMULAJ and Dawn Cunmulaj, Plaintiffs-Appellants,
v.
Kristen CHANEY and Harold Schott, Defendants-Appellees.
Sherif Cunmulaj and Dawn Cunmulaj, Plaintiffs-Appellants,
v.
Michigan State University, Defendant-Appellee.

Docket Nos. 138390, 138391. COA Nos. 282264, 282265.

Supreme Court of Michigan.

September 11, 2009.

Order

CUNMULAJ v. Chaney, 771 N.W.2d 770 (Mich. 2009).

Pincite

771 N.W.2d 770 (CUNMULAJ v. Chaney) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Sherif CUNMULAJ and Dawn Cunmulaj, Plaintiffs-Appellants, v. Kristen CHANEY and Harold Schott, Defendants-Appellees. Sherif Cunmulaj and Dawn Cunmulaj, Plaintiffs-Appellants, v. Michigan State University, Defendant-Appellee.

Order

Sherif CUNMULAJ and Dawn Cunmulaj, Plaintiffs-Appellants,
v.
Kristen CHANEY and Harold Schott, Defendants-Appellees.
Sherif Cunmulaj and Dawn Cunmulaj, Plaintiffs-Appellants,
v.
Michigan State University, Defendant-Appellee.