Cuneo v. State

Court of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma

Cuneo v. State

1911 OK CR 475, 118 P. 1105, 6 Okla. Crim. 664, 1911 Okla. Crim. App. LEXIS 462

CourtCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma

DecidedNovember 11, 1911

DocketNo. A-904.

StatusPublished

This text of 1911 OK CR 475 (Cuneo v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Cuneo v. State, 1911 OK CR 475, 118 P. 1105, 6 Okla. Crim. 664, 1911 Okla. Crim. App. LEXIS 462 (Okla. Ct. App. 1911).

Pincite

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Joe Cuneo was convicted of a violation of the prohibition law and was sentenced to serve a term of sixty days in the county'jail, and to pay a fine of one hundred dollars. The judgment and sentence was entered on April 21, 1910. An appeal was attempted to be taken by filing in this court on September 21, 1910, petition in error with case-made, the same being more than one hundred and twenty days after the rendition of such judgment. For this reason the Attorney General has filed a motion to dismiss for want of jurisdiction. The motion is well taken. It is therefore ordered that the appeal be and the same is hereby dismissed and the cause remanded to the county court of Comanche county with direction to enforce its judgment therein.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

Joe Cuneo was convicted of a violation of the prohibition law and was sentenced to serve a term of sixty days in the county'jail, and to pay a fine of one hundred dollars. The judgment and sentence was entered on April 21, 1910. An appeal was attempted to be taken by filing in this court on September 21, 1910, petition in error with case-made, the same being more than one hundred and twenty days after the rendition of such judgment. For this reason the Attorney General has filed a motion to dismiss for want of jurisdiction. The motion is well taken. It is therefore ordered that the appeal be and the same is hereby dismissed and the cause remanded to the county court of Comanche county with direction to enforce its judgment therein.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

1911 OK CR 475, 118 P. 1105, 6 Okla. Crim. 664, 1911 Okla. Crim. App. LEXIS 462, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/cuneo-v-state-oklacrimapp-1911.