Cuneo v. Cuneo

229 So. 2d 266
CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida
DecidedDecember 8, 1969
DocketNo. 69-6
StatusPublished
Cited by1 cases

This text of 229 So. 2d 266 (Cuneo v. Cuneo) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Cuneo v. Cuneo, 229 So. 2d 266 (Fla. Ct. App. 1969).

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Having heard oral argument, considered the briefs, and reviewed the record, we find there was ample evidence adduced to support the trial court’s decision to increase the alimony award in the present case. We reach this position on the ground that it is within the discretion of a trial judge to grant a petition for modification of alimony based upon unusual medical expenses which were not contemplated at the time of entry of the final divorce decree, but which arise thereafter. Clutter v. Clutter, Fla.App.1965, 171 So.2d 544.

Affirmed.

WALDEN, REED and OWEN, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Winn-Dixie Stores, Inc. v. Burse
229 So. 2d 266 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1969)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
229 So. 2d 266, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/cuneo-v-cuneo-fladistctapp-1969.