Cuneo Press, Inc. v. Industrial Commission

Illinois Supreme Court

Cuneo Press, Inc. v. Industrial Commission

203 N.E.2d 896, 32 Ill. 2d 153, 1965 Ill. LEXIS 312

CourtIllinois Supreme Court

DecidedJanuary 21, 1965

DocketNo. 38821

StatusPublished

Cited by1 cases

This text of 203 N.E.2d 896 (Cuneo Press, Inc. v. Industrial Commission) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Illinois Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Cuneo Press, Inc. v. Industrial Commission, 203 N.E.2d 896, 32 Ill. 2d 153, 1965 Ill. LEXIS 312 (Ill. 1965).

Pincite

Opinion

Mr. Justice Daily

delivered the opinion of the court:

Plaintiff, The Cuneo Press, Inc., seeks review of a judgment of the circuit court of Cook County which affirmed an order of the Industrial Commission finding, as an arbitrator had found, that defendant, Vincent J. Ventrice, was entitled to certain benefits payable under the Workmen’s Compensation Act. The sole issues raised are whether various findings by the Commission are against the manifest weight of the evidence, or are supported by evidence, and upon examination of the record we see neither reason to disturb the judgment below, nor substantial questions which require or justify an extended opinion. Rule 28 — 1 C, 28 Ill.2d xviii.

The judgment of the circuit court of Cook County is affirmed.

. Judgment affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Mr. Justice Daily

delivered the opinion of the court:

Plaintiff, The Cuneo Press, Inc., seeks review of a judgment of the circuit court of Cook County which affirmed an order of the Industrial Commission finding, as an arbitrator had found, that defendant, Vincent J. Ventrice, was entitled to certain benefits payable under the Workmen’s Compensation Act. The sole issues raised are whether various findings by the Commission are against the manifest weight of the evidence, or are supported by evidence, and upon examination of the record we see neither reason to disturb the judgment below, nor substantial questions which require or justify an extended opinion. Rule 28 — 1 C, 28 Ill.2d xviii.

The judgment of the circuit court of Cook County is affirmed.

. Judgment affirmed.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

203 N.E.2d 896, 32 Ill. 2d 153, 1965 Ill. LEXIS 312, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/cuneo-press-inc-v-industrial-commission-ill-1965.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack