Cundiff v. Division of Employment Security

Missouri Court of Appeals

Cundiff v. Division of Employment Security

279 S.W.3d 225, 2009 Mo. App. LEXIS 305, 2009 WL 482342

Missouri Court of Appeals·Decided February 27, 2009·No. WD 69883·Published

Opinion

ORDER

PER CURIAM:

Loretta Cundiff appeals the order of the Labor and Industrial Relations Commission affirming her disqualification from receiving certain unemployment benefits. In essence, Ms. Cundiff claims that the Commission’s decision that she was discharged *226 for misconduct connected with work is not supported by the evidence. Because a published opinion would have no prece-dential value, a memorandum has been provided to the parties. The order is affirmed. Rule 84.16(b).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

ORDER

PER CURIAM:

Loretta Cundiff appeals the order of the Labor and Industrial Relations Commission affirming her disqualification from receiving certain unemployment benefits. In essence, Ms. Cundiff claims that the Commission’s decision that she was discharged *226 for misconduct connected with work is not supported by the evidence. Because a published opinion would have no prece-dential value, a memorandum has been provided to the parties. The order is affirmed. Rule 84.16(b).

Cundiff v. Division of Employment Security, 279 S.W.3d 225, 2009 Mo. App. LEXIS 305, 2009 WL 482342 (Mo. Ct. App. 2009).

Pincite

279 S.W.3d 225 (Cundiff v. Division of Employment Security) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.