Cummins v. State

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas

Cummins v. State

244 S.W.2d 216, 1951 Tex. Crim. App. LEXIS 2315

CourtCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas

DecidedDecember 5, 1951

DocketNo. 25553

StatusPublished

This text of 244 S.W.2d 216 (Cummins v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Cummins v. State, 244 S.W.2d 216, 1951 Tex. Crim. App. LEXIS 2315 (Tex. 1951).

Pincite

Opinion

BEAUCHAMP, Judge.

The appellant was charged with the offense of passing a forged instrument and entered his plea of guilty. The jury assessed his punishment at confinement in the penitentiary for two years.

The record before us contains neither a statement of facts nor bill of exception. All proceedings appear to he regular and nothing is presented for review.

The judgment of the trial court is affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

BEAUCHAMP, Judge.

The appellant was charged with the offense of passing a forged instrument and entered his plea of guilty. The jury assessed his punishment at confinement in the penitentiary for two years.

The record before us contains neither a statement of facts nor bill of exception. All proceedings appear to he regular and nothing is presented for review.

The judgment of the trial court is affirmed.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

244 S.W.2d 216, 1951 Tex. Crim. App. LEXIS 2315, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/cummins-v-state-texcrimapp-1951.