Cummins v. Lake County Board of County Commissioners
671 So. 2d 893, 1996 Fla. App. LEXIS 4049, 1996 WL 185666
District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided April 19, 1996·No. No. 95-1738·Published·Cited by 3 cases
Opinion
Because we conclude that appellant’s internal communications do not rise to the level necessary under Florida’s Whistle Blower’s Act, section 112.3187(5), Florida Statutes (Supp.1992), and that the Lake County personnel to whom appellant expressed his concerns are not within the scope of persons disclosure to whom is protected by section 112.3187(6), we affirm.1
AFFIRMED.
Footnotes
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cummins v. Lake County Board of County Commissioners, 671 So. 2d 893, 1996 Fla. App. LEXIS 4049, 1996 WL 185666 (Fla. Ct. App. 1996).
671 So. 2d 893 (Cummins v. Lake County Board of County Commissioners) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Starks v. City of Miami Gardens
S.D. Florida, 2024
Perez Escalona v. City of Miami Beach
227 So. 3d 722 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2017)
Rice-Lamar v. City of Fort Lauderdale
853 So. 2d 1125 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2003)