Cummins v. Lake County Board of County Commissioners

671 So. 2d 893, 1996 Fla. App. LEXIS 4049, 1996 WL 185666
CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida
DecidedApril 19, 1996
DocketNo. 95-1738
StatusPublished
Cited by3 cases

This text of 671 So. 2d 893 (Cummins v. Lake County Board of County Commissioners) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Cummins v. Lake County Board of County Commissioners, 671 So. 2d 893, 1996 Fla. App. LEXIS 4049, 1996 WL 185666 (Fla. Ct. App. 1996).

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Because we conclude that appellant’s internal communications do not rise to the level necessary under Florida’s Whistle Blower’s Act, section 112.3187(5), Florida Statutes (Supp.1992), and that the Lake County personnel to whom appellant expressed his concerns are not within the scope of persons disclosure to whom is protected by section 112.3187(6), we affirm.1

AFFIRMED.

GOSHORN, GRIFFIN and ANTOON, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Perez Escalona v. City of Miami Beach
227 So. 3d 722 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2017)
Rice-Lamar v. City of Fort Lauderdale
853 So. 2d 1125 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2003)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
671 So. 2d 893, 1996 Fla. App. LEXIS 4049, 1996 WL 185666, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/cummins-v-lake-county-board-of-county-commissioners-fladistctapp-1996.