Cummins v. Colgate Properties Corp.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Cummins v. Colgate Properties Corp.

2 A.D.2d 749, 153 N.Y.S.2d 608, 1956 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 4791

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided July 2, 1956·Published·Cited by 5 cases

Opinion

In an action to enjoin violation of restrictive covenants and for other relief, defendants Colgate Properties Corp. and Chieco appeal from a judgment, entered after trial, in favor of plaintiff and against said defendants and from the resettled judgment. Resettled judgment unanimously affirmed, with costs. No opinion. Appeal from original judgment dismissed, without costs. The original judgment was superseded by the resettled judgment. Present — Nolan, P. J., Wenzel, Murphy, Hallinan and Kleinfeld, JJ. [2 Misc 2d 301.] [See post, p. 810.]

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

In an action to enjoin violation of restrictive covenants and for other relief, defendants Colgate Properties Corp. and Chieco appeal from a judgment, entered after trial, in favor of plaintiff and against said defendants and from the resettled judgment. Resettled judgment unanimously affirmed, with costs. No opinion. Appeal from original judgment dismissed, without costs. The original judgment was superseded by the resettled judgment. Present — Nolan, P. J., Wenzel, Murphy, Hallinan and Kleinfeld, JJ. [2 Misc 2d 301.] [See post, p. 810.]

Cummins v. Colgate Properties Corp., 2 A.D.2d 749, 153 N.Y.S.2d 608, 1956 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 4791 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1956).

Pincite

2 A.D.2d 749 (Cummins v. Colgate Properties Corp.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related