Cummins v. Colgate Properties Corp.
This text of 2 A.D.2d 749 (Cummins v. Colgate Properties Corp.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
In an action to enjoin violation of restrictive covenants and for other relief, defendants Colgate Properties Corp. and Chieco appeal from a judgment, entered after trial, in favor of plaintiff and against said defendants and from the resettled judgment. Resettled judgment unanimously affirmed, with costs. No opinion. Appeal from original judgment dismissed, without costs. The original judgment was superseded by the resettled judgment. Present — Nolan, P. J., Wenzel, Murphy, Hallinan and Kleinfeld, JJ. [2 Misc 2d 301.] [See post, p. 810.]
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
2 A.D.2d 749, 153 N.Y.S.2d 608, 1956 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 4791, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/cummins-v-colgate-properties-corp-nyappdiv-1956.