Cummins v. Canter

Court of Appeals of Kentucky

Cummins v. Canter

21 Ky. 493, 5 T.B. Mon. 493, 1827 Ky. LEXIS 193

DecidedOctober 6, 1827

StatusPublished

This text of 21 Ky. 493 (Cummins v. Canter) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Kentucky primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Cummins v. Canter, 21 Ky. 493, 5 T.B. Mon. 493, 1827 Ky. LEXIS 193 (Ky. Ct. App. 1827).

Pincite

Opinion

Judge Owsley

delivered the Opinion of the Court.

The judgment enjoined by the decree of the court below, in this case, is for less than live pounds, and the sum in contest, therefore, not cognizable in the circuit court, and by the express provisions of the act of assembly upon that subject, [494]*494should not have been enjoined by the decree of that court.

Caperlon, for plaintiff; Turner, for defendant.

The decree must be reversed with cost, the cause remanded to the court below, and the hill there dismissed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Judge Owsley

delivered the Opinion of the Court.

The judgment enjoined by the decree of the court below, in this case, is for less than live pounds, and the sum in contest, therefore, not cognizable in the circuit court, and by the express provisions of the act of assembly upon that subject, [494]*494should not have been enjoined by the decree of that court.

Caperlon, for plaintiff; Turner, for defendant.

The decree must be reversed with cost, the cause remanded to the court below, and the hill there dismissed.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

21 Ky. 493, 5 T.B. Mon. 493, 1827 Ky. LEXIS 193, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/cummins-v-canter-kyctapp-1827.