Cummins v. Bullock
This text of 3 Ky. Op. 595 (Cummins v. Bullock) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Kentucky primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Opinion of the Court by
The appellant Cummins, by his default in the action on the note, admitted the allegation that he had received, by his marriage with the principal obligor, more than enough to pay the debt sued for; and the judgment concluded him as to that matter. Consequently, he was estopped by the record from denying that fact and putting it in litigation in this case. And the demurrer to his answer was therefore properly sustained.
Bosworth being a party to this suit and failing to deny the allegation that Cummins was entitled to one half of the debt admitted by the garnishee Cooper to be due from him to them as partners, there was no error in adjudging one moity of it to the appellees as attaching creditors.,
So far we perceive no available error in the judgment. .
And as to the judgment dismissing. the petition . against the Hardins, there being no appeal from it this court has now no revisory power over it. ,
Wherefore, on this appeal Cummins, perceiving no error to his prejudice, the judgment against him is affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
3 Ky. Op. 595, 1868 Ky. LEXIS 275, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/cummins-v-bullock-kyctapp-1868.