Cummins v. Bridges
This text of 1914 OK 223 (Cummins v. Bridges) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Oklahoma primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Opinion by
This is an action on a promissory note for $380.15, balance due on an open account for ' lumber. Defendant filed an answer, asking for credit of $223.39 for material returned; $7.05 for broken glass; $7 expended in obtaining glass; $50 for difference in price and grade of lumber;' and $50 for damages.' These questions were properly submitted" to the jury and a verdict returned in favor of W. J. Bridges and against B. V. Cummins for $180.76. There being sufficient evidence to support the verdict, this court will not disturb the same.
The judgment of the lower court should therefore be affirmed.
By the Court: It is so ordered.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
1914 OK 223, 140 P. 1146, 42 Okla. 200, 1914 Okla. LEXIS 330, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/cummins-v-bridges-okla-1914.