Home/California Supreme Court/Cummins, Inc. v. SC

Cummins, Inc. v. SC

76 P.3d 364, 4 Cal. Rptr. 3d 703
California Supreme Court·Decided September 10, 2003·No. S117726·Published

Opinion

4 Cal.Rptr.3d 703 (2003)
76 P.3d 364

CUMMINS, INC.
v.
S.C. (COX).

No. S117726.

Supreme Court of California.

September 10, 2003.

Tami S. Smason, Leila Nourani, Foley & Lardner, Los Angeles, CA, for Cummins, Inc.

Lawrence J. Hutchens, Attorney at Law, Michael Scott Humphries, Law Offices of Lawrence J. Hutchens, Bellflower, CA, for Edward D. Cox and Sandi R. Cox.

Patrick James Wehage, Thomas M. Murphy, Sutton & Murphy, Mission Viego, CA, for Winnebago Industries, Inc.

Martin William Anderson, Attorney at Law, Santa Ana, CA, for Anderson Law Firm.

Keith A. Dawson, Dawson & Dawson, Corona Del Mar, CA, for Monaco Coach Corporation.

Petition for review granted.

GEORGE, C.J., and KENNARD, BAXTER, WERDEGAR, CHIN, BROWN and MORENO, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cummins, Inc. v. SC, 76 P.3d 364, 4 Cal. Rptr. 3d 703 (Cal. 2003).

76 P.3d 364 (Cummins, Inc. v. SC) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.